moderatres and aggressive nationalists
Topic: history
The leaders from 1885 - 1905 were called Moderates because:They had great faith in constitutional methods.
They believed in the justice and fair play of the British Govt.
They believed that the British Govt. could be persuaded with prayers and petitions and they would respond to it.
They did not want to overthrow the British by violence but wanted self -govt. within the British Empire.
THEIR BELIEFS:-They believed in utmost loyalty to the British.
They believed that the British presence in India was a blessing in disguise for the Indians.
They highly praised the British for introducing the developments in Science and Technology.
They had friendly relations with the British and were influenced by Western education.
They believed in the promises kept by the British.
They thought the British would grant them self - rule once they understood the Indians.
They believed in patience and reconciliation.
METHODS AND PROGRAMMES OF THE MODERATES:-Their main aim was to achieve self-Govt. under the British rule.
They adopted constitutional and peaceful methods for the attainment of their objective.
They passed resolutions at the meetings of the congress.
They submitted memorandums and petitions to the Govt. containing popular demands.
They held public demonstrations to gain public support.
Under this, they made a number of efforts and demands and criticized the govt.'s policies.
They had to politically educate the people.
Arouse political consciousness and public opinion.
Held meetings and discussions on socio-economic matters.
Organized annual meetings with the help of various leaders from across the country.
They published many weeklies and journals. E.g. a weekly called INDIA was published.
They used the press for criticizing the wrongdoings of the Govt.
They also sent representatives like Dadabhai Naoroji to England to seek a favorable public opinion there
They also followed similar non-violent means.
ATTITUDE OF THE BRITISH:-In the beginning, the Govt. looked upon the movement with favour. Lord Dufferin, the Viceroy gave a garden party to the delegates who attended the Calcutta session of the INC. The attitude of the British towards the Moderates was sympathetic and friendly in the beginning. They wanted to use the Congress as a "Safety Valve" to ease out the tension and discontentment among the masses. That is also one of the reasons why the British let A.O.Hume be one of the founding members of the Congress. In the beginning, the British were not opposed to the INC at all. They attended the meetings of the INC thinking that the Indians would restrict themselves to the academic part of the demands. But, the increased criticism of the Br. policies made the Govt. to change its attitude. They turned hostile to the INC. They treated the INC with distrust and dislike. They considered the INC an organization of self-appointed people who did not represent the entire country, but only a small part of them. The Govt. did not pay any heed to the demands of the Moderates. The British encouraged people like Raja Shiva Prasad of Benaras and Sir Syed Ahmed Khan to organize anti-Congress movements. The original attitude of the British thus underwent a sea of change because the British followed a policy of Divide and Rule to keep the INC under control and also because the English felt suspicious of the growing strength and the popularity of the INC.
DEMANDS:-
ECONOMIC REFORMS:-To eradicate poverty and to encourage Indian industries.
To reduce land revenue and to protect the rights of the farmers.
Abolition of the salt tax.
A reduction in the expenditure of the army.
To use the money thus saved on welfare projects.
To protect Indian Labour in British colonies abroad against exploitation.
Boycott of foreign cloth and bonfire of British goods.
CIVIL RIGHTS:-They opposed the curbs imposed on the freedom of speech, press and association.
CONSTITUTIONAL REFORMS:-They demanded the expansion and reform of the Imperial Legislative Council.
The people should directly elect members of the Legislative Council. The Indian Council's Act of 1892 failed to satisfy the Indians because the real power was vested in the hands of the British.
There should be a complete separation between the executive and the judicial branches of administration.
Initially, the Nationalists demanded complete self-govt.
ADMINISTRATIVE REFORMS:-They recommended that the Educated Indians should be appointed to higher posts.
They demanded simultaneous ICS exam in India and in England.
They demanded the repeal or cancellation of the Arms Act.
ACHIEVEMENTS OF THE MODERATES:-They established the Congress.
They popularized the ideas of Democracy and Civil Liberties.
They exposed the truth about the British intentions.
They laid the foundations of a strong national movement.
They promoted the spirit of a common brotherhood.
They infused national consciousness.
They were the early nationalists who sowed the seeds of nationalism well.
They were successful in ultimately holding the ICS exam simultaneously in India and England.
Achievements of the moderates:-Foundation of a Secular and Democratic National Movement:- The early nationalist leaders estd. a movement that incorporated different political trends, ideologies, social classes and groups, etc. so long as the commitment to democratic and secular nationalism was there. They laid down a strong foundation for the building up and growth of such a national movement as could ultimately achieve freedom for our people.
Political Education of the Indians:- The early nationalists saw the arousal, training and consolidation of public opinion as a major task. Their activities were directed towards this end. They were successful to a great extent, in arousing political awakening and national consciousness among the Indians. They popularized the ideas of democracy and civil liberties among the people of India.
Exposure of the true nature of the Br. rule:- In the 19th cent. The moderates were the first to develop an economic critique of colonialism and the chief contradiction between the interests of the Indian people and the Br. rule. They successfully exposed the true nature of the Br. rule in India. They eroded the popular confidence in the supposedly benevolent character of the Br. rule.
DADABHAI NAOROJI:-He was born in a Parsee family in Bombay in 1825.
He began his career as a professor in the Elphinstone College.
Dadabhai Naoroji is known as India's Unofficial Ambassador to England.
Dadabhai Naoroji wrote a book `Poverty and the Un-British Rule' in which he exposed the economic exploitation of India by the British.
He explained the fact that India could not progress because the British drained off its wealth.
D.N. was elected to the British House of Commons in 1892 on a liberal party ticket.
He championed the cause of the Indians in the British Parliament.
Not only this, but he also brought to the notice of the House the problems affecting India and its people.
He pioneered the cause of appointing educated Indians to high posts.
It is due to his efforts that the House of Commons passed a bill in 1893 to hold the ICS exam simultaneously in India and England.
His presidentship in the Congress helped to avert its split in 1906.
The resolutions of `Swaraj, Swadeshi, Boycott and National Education' were taken during his time.
He said, " We want justice and not favours, self Govt. or Swaraj like that of the United Kingdom."
He devised the Drain Theory according to which the British unnecessarily drained off its wealth from India.
He founded the East India Association in 1866.
He was elected the President of the INC thrice.
He died in 1917 at the age of 92 years and thus he is remembered as the Grand old man of India.
GOPAL KRISHNA GOKHALE:-He was born in Kolhapur in the year 1866.
He started his political career as a teacher.
He became the principal of the Ferguson College.
Became a member of the Congress in 1889.
Presided over the Benaras session of the Congress in 1905.
He was a prominent leader of the moderate wing.
He was of the view that constitutional agitation was the only way to secure constitutional reforms.
Trusted in the British sense of justice and fair play.
He never failed to criticize the unjust policies and highhanded Govt. Acts.
In 1902, he became a member of the Indian legislative assembly.
Being the member of the legislative council, he introduced the bill to make primary education compulsory.
In 1906, he est. The Servants of India Society.
Its aim was to train the people for the service of India and to promote the true interest of the people of India.
He condemned the Caste system.
He pleaded for equal rights to men and women.
He thought that the BR. would grant self-govt under their rule.
He fought against the discrimination of the lower caste.s
He opposed the unjust policies of the Br., which were against the welfare of the people.
He wanted the govt. to repeal the toll tax because the poor were very highly affected by it.
It was due to his efforts that taxes were reduced.
It was due to his efforts that the Indians were appointed to higher posts.
He was against the partition of Bengal of 1905.
Being a great economist, he believed that the policies of the Br. were responsible for the poverty in India.
He requested the Govt. to reduce the land tax to help the poor.
He asked the Govt. to encourage technical and industrial education.
He asked the Govt. to repeal the tax on cotton.
He was the editor of "Sudharak"
In 1904, he was awarded the title of Companion of Indian Empire.
He played a major role in the passage of the Minto- Morley reforms.
Made a strong plea for the reform of the legislative council and the separation of the judiciary from the executive.
Indians to be given a large share in the ICS.
He felt the need fort making village panchayats and other local bodies as effective units f local administration.
He was the forerunner or the Political Guru of Mahatma Gandhi.
At his death, Tilak said, " He was a diamond of India, the jewel of Maharashtra and the Prince of Workers."
SOME IMP. QUESTIONS:Who was called the `Grand Old man Of India?' (2001)
Ans.1. Dadabhai Naoroji was called the Grand Old Man Of India.
2 Who was called the father of the Nationalist Movement in India? (1999)
Ans. 2. Surendranath Bannerjee was called the father of the Nationalist movement in India.
3 Who founded the theosophical Society? (1998)
Ans.3. The Theosophical Society was founded by Mme. Blavatsky and Col. Olcott.
4 Who founded the Servants of India Society? (1996)
5. Who was known as India's Unofficial Ambassador to England? ( 1996, 2002)
Name any 3 imp. leaders of the Moderates. ( 2000,2002)
Achievements of the Moderates.(2002)
Who founded the East India Association? (2003)
Structured Questions:-
Attitude of the British towards the Moderates. (2000)
Short Notes:
Dadabhai Naoroji (1999, 2001)
Gokhale (1994, 2003)
Achievements of the Moderates. (1993)
Aggressive NationalistsThe leaders of the INC from 1905 to 1914 were called the extremists or the Aggressive Nationalists. They were more radical in their demands and believed in a more aggressive form of nationalism. Therefore, they were known as Extremists or Aggressive Nationalists.
FACTORS LEADING TO THE RISE OF AGGRESSIVE NATIONALISM:-FAILURE OF THE MODERATES:- The policy followed by the moderates of reconciliation and cooperation, but the Govt. Failed to heed to their demands. This attitude of the Br. gave rise to Aggressive Nationalists who had no faith in patience and petitions.
PARTITION OF BENGAL:- Lord Curzon partitioned Bengal with the aim of creating a gulf between the Hindus and the Muslims. This was done to weaken the National Movement, though the reason given was that the province was too large to govern for a single governor.
All the patriotic Indians resisted this action as it hurt their national feelings and sentiments. Moreover, the people launched the Swadeshi and Boycott Movements.
INTERNATIONAL EVENTS:- There was a firm belief among the people that the people of Asia and Africa cannot defeat their rulers. But, when Ethiopia defeated Italy and Japan defeated Russia, it infused self - confidence among the Indians.
BRITISH APATHY TO FAMINES AND PLAGUES:- Between the period of 1886-1900, India suffered from a number of Famines and plagues. Thousands of people died of starvation. However, the Br. were not the least moved by these events. Instead of organizing immediate relief work and spending the money saved on the welfare of the people, they celebrated the Silver Jubilee of Queen Victoria's accession to the throne. Tilak protested to it through his writings in the Kesari and the Maratha.
THE REPRESSIVE POLICIES OF LORD CURZON:- Lord Curzon was one such Britisher who was of the view that due to their racial superiority, only the Br. are fit to rule over India. Therefore, to harass the Indians to the fullest, he passed the Calcutta Corporation act in 1899 by which he increased the number of Englishmen in the corporation. He passed the Indian Universities Act of 1904 according to which he imposed strict control over the universities because he thought that they were the centers were nationalism was taught to the Indians. Moreover, he passed an Act in 1896, according to which it became an offence to criticize the Br.
6.IMPACT OF THE REVOLUTIONS:- The people were highly inspired by the bloody revolutions that occurred in many parts of the world esp. China, Turkey and Iran as these revolutions were fresh in the minds of the people.
ILLTREATMENT OF THE INDIANS ABROAD:- The Indians had helped the Br. to establish their territories in Asia and Africa. In return, the Indians were ill treated by the Br. They were humiliated and paid very low salary, they could not own any territory, they could not enter hotels, parks and other public places, one could always read boards like, "Dogs and Indians not allowed." They could not even travel in the same coaches as the Br. and were forced to travel in coaches meant for the Africans and Asians only. Moreover, the Registration Act required them to register themselves and to carry Identity Cards wherever they went.
ECONOMIC EXPLOITATION BY THE BRITISH:- The Br. economically exploited the Indians and did nothing about it. Therefore, this gave rise to Aggressive Nationalism in India.
AIMS AND METHODS OF THE EXTREMISTS:- The main aim of the extremists was to gain total independence of India. They knew that the Moderates had failed in their efforts and the Br. were only cheating them. Therefore, they aimed at immediate and complete independence from the Br. The moderates believed in petitions, memoranda, appeals, and etc. because they had complete faith in the Br., which the extremists did not have. The extremists knew that the Br. could be ousted from India by force alone and so they wanted immediate freedom. They were successful in making the national movement a mass movement. They used self-reliance and self- sacrifice to achieve their aim. They also proposed 3 basic methods to achieve national independence viz. Swadeshi, Boycott and National Education. Leaders like Lokmanya Tilak raised slogans like, "Swaraj is my birthright and I shall have it." They asked the people to use goods manufactured only in India. They discouraged the people from using goods made in England. Students were called upon to boycott schools and colleges run by the Govt. and to join National schools and colleges. Thus, special schools were set up to impart national education.
HOW THE EXTREMISTS DIFFERED FROM THE MODERATES IN THEIR AIMS AND METHODS: The main aim of the Extremists was to gain total independence of India and not dominion status as claimed by the Moderates.
The Moderates believed in methods like organizing public meetings/ submitting memorandums to the Govt. / holding peaceful protests,/ and discussions with the Govt. The Moderates believed in patience and non-violence rather than in violence and confrontation like their counterparts. They also sent in deputations to England.
The Aggressive Nationalists on the other hand believed in methods like Swadeshi, / Boycott,/ National Education, etc. Through these methods, the Aggressive Nationalists wanted to cripple the Br. administration. Aggressive Nationalists asked the people to use Swadeshi goods and boycott institutions run by the Govt. and also to boycott clothes made in England. Their methods were more aggressive and violent / involving self-sacrifice / suffering and hardship / and mass struggle.
ACHIEVEMENTS OF THE EXTREMISTS:-They made the National movement a mass movement.
Under their able leadership, national feelings were aroused and the national movement got a wider base.
Thus, the people united under one banner.
They instilled self- confidence and self- reliance among the people of the country.
They helped to revive the cottage industries in the country by propagating the use of Swadeshi in the country.
They used non-cooperation as a very useful weapon and instilled self-confidence among the people to raise their voices against their rulers.
BAL GANGADHAR TILAK:-(1856 - 1920)
A famous Brahmin from Maharashtra
Teacher and journalist
Fearless freedom fighter who believed that political rights will have to be fought for.
Editor of the newspapers, Kesari and Maratha which glorified ancient heritage.
Started the Ganpati Festival (1894) and the Shivaji festival (1896) to spread the spirit of nationalism.
Jailed for sedition (1897-98 and 1908-14)
Author of the slogan, " Swaraj is my birthright and I shall have it."
Well known as the father of the Indian unrest.
Organized akharas and lathi clubs to make the youth brave and to enable them to fight against their mighty rulers.
He was instrumental in formulating the Lucknow Pact.
He had a role to play in the home Rule Movement
Aware of the Br. intentions he insisted that the aim of the Congress should be Swaraj. The Br. had conquered India by force and by force alone could they be driven out of India.
He supported the No rent campaign, Swadeshi, Boycott Prohibition, etc. were preached and practiced by him.
Formed the Deccan Education Society in 1884.
Instilled confidence in the Indians by his precepts and preachings.
He believed in total; freedom from British domination.
He stood for self-reliance.
He left the INC in 1907 and organized his own party of the Extremists along with Lal and Pal.
Famous as the forerunner or political guru of Mahatma Gandhi.
LALA LAJPAT RAI:- Prominent lawyer
Advocated national education.
Associated with the DAV movement and the Arya Samaj.
Leader of the INC
Actively participated in the Surat split of the INC.
He worked to spread aggressive Nationalism
His speeches influenced the people.
He opened orphanages, schools, hospitals, etc.
Set up the SERVANTS OF THE PEOPLE SOCIETY for the welfare of the poor and the downtrodden and the outcastes.
Laid the foundation of the DAV College.
Joined hands with Madan Mohan Malaviya tin organizing the Nationalist party and he Hindu Sangathan movement for the protection of the interests of the majority community.
He took part in the non-violent demonstrations against the Simon Commission in which he was injured and lost his life.
Given the title of SHER-E-PUNJAB for his courage and determination.
In he words of Dr. Pattabi Sitaramaiya," Lala Lajpat Rai was a fighter and Not a Satytagrahi."
He wrote the books "Arya Samaj" and "England's Debt to India"
He is remembered till today for his patriotism, courage and militant ideas.
He cooperated with Gandhiji in the NCM.
He founded the Indian Home Rule League in America.
He instilled Patriotism through his writings.
SOME IMP QUESTIONS:-Who said, "Swaraj is my birthright and I shall have it?" (1996)
Bal Gangadhar Tilak said Swaraj is my Birthright and I shall have it.
Name any 3 of the nationalists who were educated in special institutions established according to the philosophy of the Extremists. (1995)
Briefly summarize the contributions of Lala Lajpat Rai to the national movement. (1993)
Briefly summarize the achievements of the extremists. (1993)
Briefly mention the achievement / contribution of Bipin Chandra Pal to the National movement. (1995)
Distinguish between the moderates and the extremists based on their ultimate aims and objectives. (1994)
Who started the paper, " The Young India?" (2003)
All 3 leaders 2004
Aims of the extremists 2004
Difference in methods of moderates and extremists. 2004
Posted by bisclassof2005hc
at 5:15 PM